Step 1
Group the catalog by differences that may change evidence needs.
Practical review guide · Free worksheet
Reviewed by ComplyFolio. Sellers and reviewers maintaining product evidence and preparing publication decisions.
Get the working templateThese are suggested operational checks to apply to your own evidence. They are not additional legal requirements or claims that the workspace automates this entire task.
Group the catalog by differences that may change evidence needs.
Select representative records from each relevant group and include known problem cases.
Record why each item was selected and the scope of checks performed.
Expand the review when findings suggest a shared issue, while keeping unreviewed products explicit.
A store checks its five best-selling products, all from one supplier, and treats the whole catalog as reviewed.
A sampling plan with coverage gaps and expansion triggers.
Boundary: Sampling is an operational prioritization method and does not prove compliance of unsampled products.
This scenario is fictional. It illustrates a review decision, not a customer outcome or a compliance determination.
The Markdown worksheet includes the procedure, the fields below, and space for findings, evidence, owners and retests. It contains no pre-approved findings. Edit it locally without an account.
Record what you observed, including unknowns. Link each decision to a source and keep unresolved questions assigned to an owner. Share completed records only through an appropriate authorized route.
The references provide the legal or technical context. The procedure and worksheet are ComplyFolio working suggestions, not official forms or a certification standard.
Sampling is an operational prioritization method and does not prove compliance of unsampled products.
Use the free workspace for an initial public product-page review, then add the manual evidence and decisions this guide requires. A page scan cannot inspect private supplier files or complete every user journey.
Start with a public product page