Signals the workflow would surface
- Automated rules identify detectable label, name, structure and contrast issues.
- Keyboard, screen-reader, zoom, checkout and support journeys remain manual tests.
EAA accessibility readiness
EAA Accessibility Checker
Run an automated EAA / WCAG readiness check and find common accessibility issues before a deeper manual audit.
Direct answerCheck a single page for common accessibility issues and get a readiness-oriented report.
What this page is for
Accessibility signals inside the same evidence workflow.
EU-facing websites preparing for accessibility reviews.
Missing labels, low contrast, weak page structure, and unclear controls.
This is a compliance workflow, risk discovery, and evidence management tool. It is not legal advice, not a legal certification, and manual review is required.
What the workspace generates
Open beta report outputs
- Page language and image alt text signals
- Optional EAA worker accessibility scan when configured
- Accessibility summary inside the product evidence pack
- Developer-friendly issue notes for manual review
- Review reminders and exportable audit trail
- Combined product compliance and accessibility workspace output
Worked example
Automated first pass plus manual plan
Illustrative input: A merchant scans a representative product page before commissioning a broader accessibility review.
Resulting artifact
The evidence report records the page, automated findings, limitations and remediation status.
Decision boundary: A single automated scan cannot establish EAA compliance or WCAG conformance.
This is a fictional workflow example, not a customer result, legal opinion, product-safety decision, or accessibility conformance claim.
Intent-specific review
A practical checklist for eaa accessibility checker.
This checklist narrows the workflow to the task on this page. Verify every item against the live product, service journey, and source evidence.
Step 1
Scan a representative page for the specific issue: Missing labels, low contrast, weak page structure, and unclear controls.
Step 2
Reproduce each automated finding and remove false positives before assigning work.
Step 3
Test keyboard use, zoom, reflow, screen-reader behavior, errors, and complete user journeys manually.
Step 4
Record pages tested, tools and rule versions, limitations, remediation status, and verification dates.
Example output
Typical findings and generated files
These examples show the shape of the workflow output. They are not legal conclusions and require manual review.
Image alt text signal missing or incomplete
review product images manually.
Page language signal detected or missing
confirm listing and warning language requirements.
EAA worker status
worker_available when the Playwright / axe scan node is configured.
Checkout-flow accessibility requires separate scripted testing and manual review.
Checkout-flow accessibility requires separate scripted testing and manual review.
Methodology and review status
Rules-based evidence review with explicit boundaries.
The workspace extracts bounded page evidence, applies versioned rules, and optionally runs axe in an isolated browser worker. Automated output is directional and must be verified against the live journey, supplier evidence, product-specific requirements, and applicable national law.
Rules version: 2026.09.2. Last reviewed: . See the public changelog.
Primary references
Authoritative sources for deeper review.
Free public beta
Paste one physical product detail URL into the workspace.
No login and no payment. All generated outputs are open in the Free Beta workflow.
New product review
Start with a product link
Use one URL for a focused review, or paste a small batch when you need to compare listings.
Add optional listing context for a more specific review
You can run the check with only a public URL. Add these details when you already know them; unknown fields remain review tasks.
Sales countries for professional language review · none selected
Manual fallback if a product page is blocked
Run a product link check to generate a complete report.
No login, no payment, no locked report. Results are generated from extracted page signals and structured rules.
FAQ
Questions about this readiness workflow
Is the EAA Accessibility Checker an accessibility certification?
No. Check a single page for common accessibility issues and get a readiness-oriented report. The output provides readiness signals for review, but it is not legal advice, not a certification, and not a replacement for manual accessibility testing.
What should eu-facing websites preparing for accessibility reviews review manually?
Missing labels, low contrast, weak page structure, and unclear controls. Complete journeys, assistive-technology behavior, content meaning, and user testing remain manual review tasks.
Why include GPSR outputs on an accessibility page?
EU-facing ecommerce sellers often need both product evidence and accessibility readiness work. The workspace keeps both in one report and evidence pack.
Related pages