Signals the workflow would surface
- Reflow, target size, orientation and visible focus are checked at representative viewport sizes.
- Touch and mobile screen-reader behavior are tested manually for the complete task.
EAA accessibility readiness
Review mobile storefront pages for reflow, tap targets, focus, orientation, labels, dialogs, sticky controls, and readable content.
What this page is for
Mobile-first stores, DTC brands, and agencies maintaining responsive ecommerce themes.
Desktop scans can miss mobile navigation traps, sticky overlays, clipped content, small targets, and touch-specific interaction problems.
This is a compliance workflow, risk discovery, and evidence management tool. It is not legal advice, not a legal certification, and manual review is required.
What the workspace generates
Worked example
Illustrative input: A narrow viewport uses a navigation drawer, sticky add-to-cart control, variant modal and on-screen validation messages.
The report records device and viewport conditions, affected controls, reproduction steps and retest evidence.
Decision boundary: Desktop results cannot establish mobile accessibility, and mobile guidance remains part of WCAG rather than a separate certification.
This is a fictional workflow example, not a customer result, legal opinion, product-safety decision, or accessibility conformance claim.
Intent-specific review
This checklist narrows the workflow to the task on this page. Verify every item against the live product, service journey, and source evidence.
Test narrow viewport reflow and zoom
Review tap target spacing
Test menus, drawers, dialogs, and sticky controls
Use mobile screen readers on representative journeys
Example output
These examples show the shape of the workflow output. They are not legal conclusions and require manual review.
review product images manually.
confirm listing and warning language requirements.
worker_available when the Playwright / axe scan node is configured.
Checkout-flow accessibility requires separate scripted testing and manual review.
Methodology and review status
The workspace extracts bounded page evidence, applies versioned rules, and optionally runs axe in an isolated browser worker. Automated output is directional and must be verified against the live journey, supplier evidence, product-specific requirements, and applicable national law.
Rules version: 2026.09.2. Last reviewed: . See the public changelog.
Primary references
Free public beta
No login and no payment. All generated outputs are open in the Free Beta workflow.
New product review
Use one URL for a focused review, or paste a small batch when you need to compare listings.
You can run the check with only a public URL. Add these details when you already know them; unknown fields remain review tasks.
No login, no payment, no locked report. Results are generated from extracted page signals and structured rules.
FAQ
No. It provides readiness signals and an evidence workflow. Conformance claims require an appropriately scoped evaluation, manual testing, and accountable professional review.
Automated tools detect only part of the problem space and cannot fully assess task completion, content meaning, assistive-technology behavior, or the complete customer journey.
Related pages