Signals the workflow would surface
- Visible information is mapped to the exact page component where a customer can find it.
- Certificates, reports and internal assessments remain linked evidence instead of being copied into marketing content.
GPSR product listing readiness
Organize product-page requirements into operator, traceability, warning, instruction, language, and supporting-evidence review tasks.
What this page is for
Ecommerce teams deciding what belongs on the product page and what belongs in the evidence file.
Teams often copy every document onto a listing or, at the other extreme, assume private files replace visible distance-sale information.
This is a compliance workflow, risk discovery, and evidence management tool. It is not legal advice, not a legal certification, and manual review is required.
What the workspace generates
Worked example
Illustrative input: An ecommerce team needs to decide which operator, identifier, warning and instruction fields belong on a live offer.
A publication matrix assigns each verified statement to the page, label, packaging, manual or private evidence file.
Decision boundary: The matrix is a review aid, not a universal list for every product category or Member State.
This is a fictional workflow example, not a customer result, legal opinion, product-safety decision, or accessibility conformance claim.
Intent-specific review
This checklist narrows the workflow to the task on this page. Verify every item against the live product, service journey, and source evidence.
List visible product identity fields
List manufacturer and EU operator fields
List product-specific warnings and instructions
Link each visible statement to a verified source
Example output
These examples show the shape of the workflow output. They are not legal conclusions and require manual review.
request registered supplier details.
add verified economic operator information.
request label artwork and traceability records.
export product.json, checklist.json, supplier email, label draft, warnings, platform fields, snapshot, and review schedule.
Methodology and review status
The workspace extracts bounded page evidence, applies versioned rules, and optionally runs axe in an isolated browser worker. Automated output is directional and must be verified against the live journey, supplier evidence, product-specific requirements, and applicable national law.
Rules version: 2026.09.2. Last reviewed: . See the public changelog.
Primary references
Free public beta
No login and no payment. All generated outputs are open in the Free Beta workflow.
New product review
Use one URL for a focused review, or paste a small batch when you need to compare listings.
You can run the check with only a public URL. Add these details when you already know them; unknown fields remain review tasks.
No login, no payment, no locked report. Results are generated from extracted page signals and structured rules.
FAQ
It turns the review into structured findings, follow-up tasks, generated drafts, and evidence-pack records. It does not issue a legal approval or certification.
No. Product identity, operator details, warnings, instructions, translations, and documents must be checked against the live product and authoritative evidence before use.
Related pages