Signals the workflow would surface
- The physical product, software function and update path are documented separately.
- Other digital-content, consumer and accessibility rules are flagged for review.
GPSR product listing readiness
Use a cautious scope checklist for digital downloads, connected products, embedded software, and products supplied with a service.
What this page is for
Etsy, Shopify, course, template, software, and connected-product sellers trying to decide which EU product-safety workflow applies.
The listing label 'digital product' is not enough to determine GPSR scope, and different EU rules may apply to products, software, digital content, or services.
This is a compliance workflow, risk discovery, and evidence management tool. It is not legal advice, not a legal certification, and manual review is required.
What the workspace generates
Evidence-based guidance
Primary sources: GPSR Article 3 definitions and digital-product recitals · EU digital contract rules overview
Worked example
Illustrative input: A seller offers downloadable control software bundled with a physical connected consumer product.
The scope worksheet records facts and questions for a qualified reviewer instead of issuing a blanket classification.
Decision boundary: The label 'digital product' alone is not enough to decide whether GPSR applies or does not apply.
This is a fictional workflow example, not a customer result, legal opinion, product-safety decision, or accessibility conformance claim.
Intent-specific review
This checklist narrows the workflow to the task on this page. Verify every item against the live product, service journey, and source evidence.
Is a physical consumer product supplied, enabled, controlled, or modified by the digital item?
Is software embedded in or connected to a consumer product, and can updates affect safety?
Is the offer targeted at EU consumers through shipping, language, currency, domain, or other market signals?
Which product-specific, digital-content, consumer, accessibility, or national rules also need review?
Example output
These examples show the shape of the workflow output. They are not legal conclusions and require manual review.
request registered supplier details.
add verified economic operator information.
request label artwork and traceability records.
export product.json, checklist.json, supplier email, label draft, warnings, platform fields, snapshot, and review schedule.
Methodology and review status
The workspace extracts bounded page evidence, applies versioned rules, and optionally runs axe in an isolated browser worker. Automated output is directional and must be verified against the live journey, supplier evidence, product-specific requirements, and applicable national law.
Rules version: 2026.09.2. Last reviewed: . See the public changelog.
Primary references
Free public beta
No login and no payment. All generated outputs are open in the Free Beta workflow.
New product review
Use one URL for a focused review, or paste a small batch when you need to compare listings.
You can run the check with only a public URL. Add these details when you already know them; unknown fields remain review tasks.
No login, no payment, no locked report. Results are generated from extracted page signals and structured rules.
FAQ
No. Do not classify every digital download as automatically covered or exempt; document the product, delivery model, software connection, and target market first. This is a compliance workflow, risk discovery, and evidence management tool, not legal advice or a legal certification.
It focuses on The listing label 'digital product' is not enough to determine GPSR scope, and different EU rules may apply to products, software, digital content, or services. The workspace then generates structured findings, supplier tasks, drafts, reminders, and Evidence Pack output for manual review.
No. The report helps identify missing information and organize evidence. Manual review is required before publishing or submitting compliance materials.
Related pages